Integrative surface

[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”100px”][vc_column_text]

RBM TC SURFACE

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text el_class=”filosofia-quote-blue”]“Blasting with biomineral, calcium-phosphate particles”.
“Cleaning of inorganic and organic contaminants with acid and organic solvents.”

[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]

RBM TC SURFACE

Chemical anylisis

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]

Chemical analysis with EDS after implant cleaning

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]Minnesota University

Analysis performed by the MORCBB (Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics)from the University of Minesota.

“The blasted and cleaned dental implant surface only shows significant signal for titanium, which demonstrates that the rough implant is throughly cleaned.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”100px”][vc_column_text el_class=”tablas-superficie-integradora”][/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

These tables show the percentage of particles on the RMB TC surface after cleaning. Only Titanium is shown

[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]

RBM TC SURFACE

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]

Roughness

Minnesota University

Analysis performed by the MORCBB (Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics) from the University of Minnesota

“The surface after blasting and cleaning appears homogeneously microrough in all parts of the implant.”[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”983″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]

RMB TC surface roughness in different parts of the implant

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]

Pictures of the RMB TC surface x 10.000 with SEM

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

RBM TC SURFACE

Success Rate

[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”971″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]

RBM TC SURFACE

Success rate. Oncologic patients

Since 1996 onwards we have used 771 Mozo-Grau implants [ …}. The success rate in this sampling was 94.25% {…}

Reconstructive Oral abd Maxilofacial Surgery
Carlos; Navarro Vila, Carlos
Springer, 2015

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

The overall 5-year survival rate in irradiated patients was 92.6%. Irradiated patients had a marginally significantly higher implant loss than non-irradiated patients (p = 0.063). The 5-year survival rate in the osteoradionecrosis group was of 48.3% and in the non-osteoradionecrosis group 92.3% with a statistically significant difference between both groups (p = 0.002).

Osseointegrated implants rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients

Naval Gías, Luis et al.
Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol 70, Issue 5, 2012

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]