Implant-Prosthesis Adjustment

[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”100px”][vc_column_text]

ADJUSTMENTS/MICROLEAKAGE

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text el_class=”filosofia-quote-pink”]”…the interface or microgap between the implant and abutment has been suggested to have a detrimental effect on the marginal bone level (Henllan et al. 1997; Broggini et al. 2006).”

[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

GAP ANALYSIS

Silver nitrate infiltration

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]

Analysis performed by the MORCBB (Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics)from the University of Minesota

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text]“There is no indication that AgNo3NH4OH solution entered the space between screw (Right Picture), abutment and implant (Left Picture). No gap was found at screw/abutment or abutment/implant interface”.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]

GAP ANALYSISI. STAINING

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]“However, if only applied torque is analysed, the lower levels of microleakage occur in 30 Ncm tightened abutments, where, as shown in the photomicrographs, the gap is virtually nonexistent for Morse tapes connections and external connections get an almost perfect seal. This may be due to the strict manufacturing criteria found in the analysed elements”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_single_image image=”980″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”50px”][vc_column_text]

BONE REMODELING

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text el_class=”filosofia-quote-blue”]“…Global mean marginal bone loss with Inhex® was 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.12 ± 0.17 mm. as determined 6 and 12 months after prosthetic loading, respectively…”.

Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”687″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]

[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”981″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row]